Talk:Documentation/Calc Functions/ACOT

SF Review Comments

(1) Should the Arguments section discussion the error status when an out of range value is passed to the function? We need to be consistent about where we make this statement.

(2) In the Arguments section, should "Number" be in bold?

(3) In the Additional detail section, I notice that the bullet "Alternatively multiply by 180/PI() to convert the result from radians to degrees." was not included for ACOS. Probably best to include always or never.

(4) In the 2nd examples, is "The tangent of 45 degrees is 1." necessary?

--Stevefanning (talk) 2020-09-06T17:16:15 (UTC)

RG Reply

As mentioned all further functions have error cases in additional section and corrected for earlier cases

All arguments to the function are bold throughout that is the structure I saw was being followed and I didn't find problem with it

Added there

Removed

--RonnieGandhi (talk) 2020-09-07T7:43:55 (UTC)

OH: Back to "principal value", here I think it's the branch of the function between ]0, +pi[. It worth to clarify the Summary.

--Olivier Hallot 2020-09-07T14:06:04 (UTC)