Talk:ReleasePlan
Contents
Stub
Stub 2
Draft: Adding EOL to the table
release | freeze | publishing |
---|---|---|
3.6.0 | Week 23, Jun 4 - Jun 10, 2012 | Week 32, Aug 6 - Aug 12, 2012 |
3.6.7 | Week 26, Jun 24 - Jun 30, 2013 | Week 29, Jul 15 - Jul 21, 2013 |
End of Life | July 21, 2013 |
If we feel like EOL doesn't really fit in with the columns for release and freeze, we could just put one table on top of the other:
release | freeze | publishing |
---|---|---|
3.6.0 | Week 23, Jun 4 - Jun 10, 2012 | Week 32, Aug 6 - Aug 12, 2012 |
3.6.7 | Week 26, Jun 24 - Jun 30, 2013 | Week 29, Jul 15 - Jul 21, 2013 |
End of Life | July 21, 2013 |
---|
3.3.x
As the 3.4.0 beta1 and beta2 are delivered, is there really a 3.3.3 planned ??? If not so, would not it be in order to delete the 3.3.0 sub-section ?? Bellerophon 2011-04-22T11:03:00 (CEST)
- I think you mean 3.3.3, this can happen for stability and security reasons. Volkerme 2011-04-23T12:55:06 (CEST)
- Right, I meant 3.3.3, sorry for the mistake. I corrected it. Bellerophon 2011-04-25T10:43:41 (CEST)
- This mail suggests a 3.3.3 will be issued : [1] Bellerophon 2011-04-29T12:45:43 (CEST)
- Right, I meant 3.3.3, sorry for the mistake. I corrected it. Bellerophon 2011-04-25T10:43:41 (CEST)
Same date everywhere
Anyone has an idea why all the dates in all the tables are the same now? I only noticed this today, must be something very recent. I had a look at the templates in use in this page but none has been modified recently... Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T13:34:06 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information, we are working on this. Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T13:46:07 (UTC)
- Wow, good catch! Temporary undo and will check what (on the template) went wrong. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-07T13:53:42 (UTC)
- Ok, the cleanup bot did not cause the problem. Must be anywhere in the templates. Investigation is still under way. It would be helpful if anybody can tell the date/time the problem ocurred (or dates before failure) Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T18:07:22 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now! What was the culprit? Cheers! Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T22:48:46 (UTC)
- By the way: this issue was tracked at tdf#73357. The problem was, that the documentation at the Template:Evalp was moved to a sup page, but accidentally a newline was added which resulted in wrong return value (of another template of again another template...) which causes Template:Release-plan-one-line-interval to display - well - rubbish. The fix was rather easy as you can see at this diff: simply place the nowiki-tags directly after the code without a newline. I didn't see the new line when I was searching for the problem. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-08T07:47:05 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now! What was the culprit? Cheers! Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T22:48:46 (UTC)
- Ok, the cleanup bot did not cause the problem. Must be anywhere in the templates. Investigation is still under way. It would be helpful if anybody can tell the date/time the problem ocurred (or dates before failure) Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T18:07:22 (UTC)
- Wow, good catch! Temporary undo and will check what (on the template) went wrong. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-07T13:53:42 (UTC)
6.1 Release
Links to detailed release plan and release notes of 6.1 point to 6.0 release. --Jumbo444 (talk) 2018-03-05T21:47:22 (UTC) Corrected by Dennis. Thanks. --Jumbo444 (talk) 2018-04-03T17:41:15 (UTC)
- Hi Jumbo,
- uhm, I'm sorry, I didn't saw your comment.
- Samuel did point the fact to me in irc.
- Next time feel free to do it on your own; I have promoted you now to be an administrator. ;-)
- Dennis Roczek (talk) 2018-04-03T17:44:54 (UTC)
Typo in 6.2 release table
6.2.6 appears twice. The second occurrence should probably be 6.2.7 instead. Could someone with edit permissions fix this? Ahiijny (talk) 2019-01-23T15:07:51 (UTC)
- Pinging User:X1sc0. Ahiijny (talk) 2019-02-02T03:01:44 (UTC)
- Pinging Ahiijny. Where is the problem? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/6.2#6.2.7_release ? I can't see it
- Fixed with this edit: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=ReleasePlan&type=revision&diff=172864&oldid=172521 --Beluga (talk) 2019-02-02T21:51:37 (UTC)
- I should have specified that the typo was in the ReleasePlan#6.2_release table. Thanks for the fix, User:Beluga! (btw I think pings only work if edit is signed?... I didn't get that last ping) Ahiijny (talk) 2019-02-02T23:31:41 (UTC)