Talk:ReleasePlan
Stub
Stub 2
Draft: Adding EOL to the table
| release | freeze | publishing |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6.0 | Week 23, Jun 4 - Jun 10, 2012 | Week 32, Aug 6 - Aug 12, 2012 |
| 3.6.7 | Week 26, Jun 24 - Jun 30, 2013 | Week 29, Jul 15 - Jul 21, 2013 |
| End of Life | July 21, 2013 | |
If we feel like EOL doesn't really fit in with the columns for release and freeze, we could just put one table on top of the other:
| release | freeze | publishing |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6.0 | Week 23, Jun 4 - Jun 10, 2012 | Week 32, Aug 6 - Aug 12, 2012 |
| 3.6.7 | Week 26, Jun 24 - Jun 30, 2013 | Week 29, Jul 15 - Jul 21, 2013 |
| End of Life | July 21, 2013 |
|---|
3.3.x
As the 3.4.0 beta1 and beta2 are delivered, is there really a 3.3.3 planned ??? If not so, would not it be in order to delete the 3.3.0 sub-section ?? Bellerophon 2011-04-22T11:03:00 (CEST)
- I think you mean 3.3.3, this can happen for stability and security reasons. Volkerme 2011-04-23T12:55:06 (CEST)
- Right, I meant 3.3.3, sorry for the mistake. I corrected it. Bellerophon 2011-04-25T10:43:41 (CEST)
- This mail suggests a 3.3.3 will be issued : [1] Bellerophon 2011-04-29T12:45:43 (CEST)
- Right, I meant 3.3.3, sorry for the mistake. I corrected it. Bellerophon 2011-04-25T10:43:41 (CEST)
Same date everywhere
Anyone has an idea why all the dates in all the tables are the same now? I only noticed this today, must be something very recent. I had a look at the templates in use in this page but none has been modified recently... Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T13:34:06 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information, we are working on this. Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T13:46:07 (UTC)
- Wow, good catch! Temporary undo and will check what (on the template) went wrong. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-07T13:53:42 (UTC)
- Ok, the cleanup bot did not cause the problem. Must be anywhere in the templates. Investigation is still under way. It would be helpful if anybody can tell the date/time the problem ocurred (or dates before failure) Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T18:07:22 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now! What was the culprit? Cheers! Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T22:48:46 (UTC)
- By the way: this issue was tracked at tdf#73357. The problem was, that the documentation at the Template:Evalp was moved to a sup page, but accidentally a newline was added which resulted in wrong return value (of another template of again another template...) which causes Template:Release-plan-one-line-interval to display - well - rubbish. The fix was rather easy as you can see at this diff: simply place the nowiki-tags directly after the code without a newline. I didn't see the new line when I was searching for the problem. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-08T07:47:05 (UTC)
- Looks fixed now! What was the culprit? Cheers! Chtfn (talk) 2014-01-07T22:48:46 (UTC)
- Ok, the cleanup bot did not cause the problem. Must be anywhere in the templates. Investigation is still under way. It would be helpful if anybody can tell the date/time the problem ocurred (or dates before failure) Volkerme (talk) 2014-01-07T18:07:22 (UTC)
- Wow, good catch! Temporary undo and will check what (on the template) went wrong. Dennis Roczek (talk) 2014-01-07T13:53:42 (UTC)
6.1 Release
Links to detailed release plan and release notes of 6.1 point to 6.0 release. --Jumbo444 (talk) 2018-03-05T21:47:22 (UTC) Corrected by Dennis. Thanks. --Jumbo444 (talk) 2018-04-03T17:41:15 (UTC)
- Hi Jumbo,
- uhm, I'm sorry, I didn't saw your comment.
- Samuel did point the fact to me in irc.
- Next time feel free to do it on your own; I have promoted you now to be an administrator. ;-)
- Dennis Roczek (talk) 2018-04-03T17:44:54 (UTC)
Typo in 6.2 release table
6.2.6 appears twice. The second occurrence should probably be 6.2.7 instead. Could someone with edit permissions fix this? Ahiijny (talk) 2019-01-23T15:07:51 (UTC)
- Pinging User:X1sc0. Ahiijny (talk) 2019-02-02T03:01:44 (UTC)
- Pinging Ahiijny. Where is the problem? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan/6.2#6.2.7_release ? I can't see it
- Fixed with this edit: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=ReleasePlan&type=revision&diff=172864&oldid=172521 --Beluga (talk) 2019-02-02T21:51:37 (UTC)
- I should have specified that the typo was in the ReleasePlan#6.2_release table. Thanks for the fix, User:Beluga! (btw I think pings only work if edit is signed?... I didn't get that last ping) Ahiijny (talk) 2019-02-02T23:31:41 (UTC)
7.6 lacking links
"See also the detailed schedule and the release notes."
24.2 lacking links
First paragraph of release plan and and fourth paragraph have the same content. Please delete the fourth paragraph.
24.2 Link to release notes is missing
Add the link to the release notes and the detailed schedule under the table like for release 7.6